Monday, August 12, 2013

Left-Wing Labor Protesters Funded by Taxpayer Dollars

Labor activists using tactics adopted from the Occupy Wall Street movement are crashing restaurants across the nation in an effort to raise wages for workers – and they’re getting taxpayer money to fund the effort.
Using a combination of federal grants and grants from left-leaning organizations, the Restaurant Opportunity Center, or ROC, is technically a charitable nonprofit and not a union. But their pro-worker messages, anti-employer protests and self-proclaimed goal of organizing service sector employees for the purposes of negotiating higher wages make ROC look and sound much like a labor union.
Some see their tactics as a deliberate attempt to skirt the nation’s labor laws. Only unions elected by a majority of a workplace can negotiate with employers on workers’ behalf, though ROC seems to be doing so in the absence of any election.
But others, including the head of the AFL-CIO, an umbrella group for dozens of labor unions, see ROC and groups like them as the new face of labor organizing in America.
While the Restaurant Opportunity Center is working to increase wages for some workers, they are getting paid, in part, with federal tax dollars.
According to tax filings for ROC United, the parent organization that has launched the smaller chapters operating in many cities, the group got $180,000 in government grants during 2010 and another $60,000 in similar grants during 2011.
The organization’s budget was about $1.72 million in 2010 and $2.65 million in 2011 – meaning taxpayer dollars accounted for a little more than 5 percent of their operating costs.
Other funding for ROC’s initiatives comes from the usual left-wing sources, including grants from the Tides Foundation, a group that also gets tax dollars from the federal government, as a previous Watchdog.org investigation uncovered.
Some Republican members of Congress are asking for an investigation into a Department of Labor grant to ROC.

Exposing the media-manufactured racism of the Trayvon Martin story

Arthur Weinreb’s book, Racism and the Death of Trayvon Martin’: Legal Insights into the Trial of George Zimmerman’, recently released by Smashwords Copyright 2013,  is the literary answer to a new mural entitled ‘We are all Trayvon Martin’ unveiled inside Florida’s Capitol in Tallahassee over the weekend.

‘We are all Trayvon Martin’ features a man shooting a hooded figure in the back of the head. “At 10 feet long, there’s also room for the bleeding visage of Martin Luther King Jr. and the words “we are all Trayvon Martin” in multiple languages,” writesRobert Laurie in his column.

Weinreb argues far more eloquently and convincingly in his book that we could all be George Zimmerman, accused of media-hyped racism in a tragedy that has nothing to do with racism.

A Not Guilty verdict notwithstanding, Zimmerman will spend the rest of his days looking over his shoulder.  His is a story that never ends.  Ditto for Weinreb’s ‘Racism and the Death of Trayvon Martin’.  Reading the book teaches us that what happened to Zimmerman will happen again.  And again and again.

Indeed, Weinreb’s concise and well-written ‘Racism and the Death of Trayvon Martin’ could be described as What Happened, What Didn’t Happen and What Happens Now.

Currently writing for Decoded Scienceand Digital Journal, Weinreb is the Associate Editor for Canada Free Press (CFP).


[VIDEO] GOP congressman: Probably have enough votes in House to impeach Obama

Rep. Blake Farenthold, a Texas Republican, told constituents at a townhall over the weekend that the House of Representatives would “probably” have enough votes to impeach President Obama.
Farenthold was in Luling, Texas on Saturday, and after stepping past a question about the president’s birth certificate, suggested that the House would have the votes to impeach the president, but the Democratic Senate would kill the effort.
“A question I get a lot — ‘If everybody’s so unhappy with what the president’s doing, why don’t you impeach him?’” Farenthold said.
“I’ll give you a real frank answer about that. If we were to impeach the president tomorrow, you could probably get the votes in the House of Representatives to do it, but it would go to the Senate and he wouldn’t be convicted.”
A video of the remarks — filmed presumably by the woman who asked about Obama’s birth certificate, based on the video’s description — was posted to YouTube Sunday.

Continue Reading...

[VIDEO] Texas Congressman Schools Atheist at Town Hall


THE BLAZE: You’d think the question of adding “atheist chaplains” to the military was put to rest by the House of Representatives, which voted against the controversial proposal several few weeks ago, but the secular humanist lobby is continuing to battle.
 
This time an atheist college student, Daniel Moran, took to the microphone at a town hall meeting Thursday and asked U.S. Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) why he twice voted against the measure.
 
Instead of shrinking from the student’s pointed question, Burgess had this to say: “Yeah, I thought that was a dumb idea. I’ll do it again.”
 
The audience erupted in applause and hoots and hollers upon hearing Burgess’ response. One man in the crowd shouted, “There are no atheists in foxholes!”
Via: Fox News

Continue Reading....

U.S. Expats Balk at Tax Law. American Citizen Renunciations Are Soaring


More U.S. citizens are giving up their American passports as the government cracks down on tax evaders. The WSJ’s Deborah Kan speaks to lawyer Eugene Chow about the main reason why many don’t want to be American anymore.
KONG—The U.S.'s crackdown on global tax evaders is leading to a record number of people renouncing their citizenship, and its effects are being felt keenly in Asia—now the world's wealthiest region by household assets.
imageA growing number of wealthy Americans in Asia—and others with green cards—are exploring whether to renounce their U.S. citizenship or give up their green cards to avoid onerous tax obligations.
Bloomberg News
A growing number of Americans are exploring whether to renounce their U.S. citizenship or give up their green cards to avoid onerous tax obligations.
Globally, more U.S. citizens have renounced their citizenship in the first and second quarters than all of 2012 combined, and 2013 is already on track to becoming a record year for renunciations. A total of 1,130 names appeared on the latest list of renunciations from the Internal Revenue Service, according to Andrew Mitchel, a tax lawyer who tracks the data. That is far above the previous high of 679, set in the first quarter, and more than were reported in all of 2012.

Holder Rolls Back Laws from Reagan's 'War on Drugs'

Attorney General Eric Holder is set to announce a major shift in federal criminal policy on Monday, overturning the decades-old "mandatory minimum prison sentences" for low-level, nonviolent drug offenders, a hallmark of President Ronald Reagan's War on Drugs.

Under the new policy, prosecutors would send fewer drug offenders to federal prison for long sentences, while judges would have more discretion in sentencing.

"Too many Americans go to too many prisons for far too long, and for no good law enforcement reason," Holder plans to say in a speech to the American Bar Association in San Francisco.

Describing his new approach as "Smart on Crime," Holder contends the current laws exacerbate "a vicious cycle of poverty, criminality and incarceration" that "traps too many Americans and weakens too many communities."

"By targeting the most serious offenses, prosecuting the most dangerous criminals, directing assistance to crime 'hot spots,' and pursuing new ways to promote public safety, deterrence, efficiency and fairness — we can become both smarter and tougher on crime," he will say.
Holder will also voice support for bipartisan legislative efforts in Congress and on the state level aimed at reducing the use of mandatory minimum sentences and expanding the use of diversion programs in an effort to reduce the U.S. prison population.

“Today, a vicious cycle of poverty, criminality and incarceration traps too many Americans and weakens too many communities,” Holder said in remarks prepared for the American Bar Association conference where he will outline his proposals. “However, many aspects of our criminal justice system may actually exacerbate this problem, rather than alleviate it.”

Via: Newsmax


Continue Reading.....

Mark Levin's The Liberty Amendments

Today marks the publication of Mark Levin's important new book, The Liberty Amendments. I must confess that I had some trepidation when starting to read it, for as the editor of American Thinker I turn down most submissions that propose amending the Constitution as a solution for what ails us. The reason is simple: amending the Constitution is deliberately difficult to accomplish, so changing it is a solution easy to propose and difficult to dispose.

But Mark, whose body of work as a political thinker includes not just the significant tomes Men in BlackLiberty and Tyranny, and Ameritopia but also three hours a day of extemporaneous political talk on one the nation's most popular syndicated talk shows, is in a different category. And not simply because of his stature. The Liberty Amendmentsconsists of a well thought-out program of amendments (offered as a starting point for discussion and modification), combined with a political strategy that could (at least potentially) work: using a constitutional convention called by two-thirds of the states. As Article 5 of the Constitution reads:

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.


In Chapter One of the Book, "Restoring the American Republic (also the subtitle of the book itself), Mark lays out his case that judicial precedent and politics have in effect altered the Constitution the framer's intended us to have, and restoring a constitutional republic as originally envisioned is going to require some extensive amending. Fortunately, Mark has posted this chapter online for all to read. I urge readers to click on the link and see the case that Mark makes.

Via: The American Thinker


Continue Reading....

Popular Posts