Monday, September 9, 2013

JW Triggers Senate Probe into Obamacare Hiring Frenzy

Citing documents uncovered by Judicial Watch, a group of United States Senators has launched an investigation into the Obama administration’s plan to skirt normal government hiring procedures to enlist 1,814 highly-paid, top-level administrators to expedite the president’s healthcare law.

In late July JW obtained internal documents outlining the secret arrangement granting the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) authority to cast aside normal government hiring protocol to allow a high-level hiring surge on the day Obamacare passed. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the agency responsible for recruiting and hiring the federal workforce, gave HHS extraordinary “direct-hire appointing authority,” in order to bypass normal channels and “hire quickly” to execute Obama’s healthcare reform directive, according to the documents obtained by JW.    

In all, HHS was granted permission to utilize what is known as a “valuable human capital recruitment tool” to enlist 1,814 top-level government employees making annual taxpayer-funded salaries between $70,000 and $130,000. More than 1,100 of the new employees would start at the higher pay scale of nearly $100,000 annually, the documents reveal. JW’s investigation into this scandal is ongoing, but now six United States senators are looking into the matter.

In a letter sent today to the acting director of OPM, the senators are demanding answers about the agency’s decision to grant HHS “direct hire authority” after the passage of Obamacare, which is officially known as The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The lawmakers point out that direct-hire authority is a legal authority that OPM can give federal agencies for filling vacancies when a critical hiring need or severe shortage of candidates exists.
In this case, the special hiring authority was only granted temporarily for six months to fill 1,800 “mission critical positions” that were “necessary for implementing the health care law,” according to the senators. Under that formula HHS would have had to hire 10 individuals per day during that period, the senators write. The pace of hiring that would be required for HHS to fill each of those “critical needs” is incredible, the letter says. The senators want to know if every single “critical need” position was filled before the authority terminated and they want a list of when each position was filled.

The lawmakers also want to know if individuals hired to fill “critical need” positions were properly vetted with background checks and if they were granted security clearances of any kind. They’re also requesting information on how the jobs were advertised to make the public aware that the government positions were being filled. “What methods did OPM or HHS use to identify candidates for the “critical need” positions?” The senators—Tom Coburn, Richard Burr, Michael Enzi, Charles Grassley, Kelly Ayotte and John Thune—ask for a “full and timely response” in 30 days.


Treasury: Debt Up $0 in August; CBO: But Deficit Was $146B

Treasury Secretary Jack Lew(CNSNews.com) - The federal deficit increased by $146 billion in August, according to a report released today by the Congressional Budget Office. But, at the same time, according to the U.S. Treasury, the federal debt did not increase at all during the month.
Total federal receipts were $185 billion during August, according to the CBO, while total federal outlays were $331 billion. Thus, the Treasury was forced to engage in $146 billion in deficit spending.
Despite this deficit spending, the Treasury reported that at the close of every single business day in August, the federal debt subject to a legal limit by Congress remained exactly $16,699,396,000,000.
That is approximately just $25 million below the legal limit on the debt that is $16,699,421,095,673.60
If the federal debt had climbed by the same $146 billion that the deficit climbed in August, it would have exceeded the legal limit by almost $146 billion.
In fact, according to the Daily Treasury Statements that the Treasury publishes at 4:00 p.m. on each business day, the debt subject to the legal limit has remained at exactly $16,699,396,000,000--or about $25 million below the legal limit--every day since May 17.
Via: CNS News

Continue Reading....

Isolationists, Isolationists Everywhere

The Force is strong with the isolationists this week.
This is not the time for armchair isolationism.
Most Republicans don’t want to become, again, the party of isolationists.
Nations such as China, Russia and Iran would see this as the triumph of a political coalition between the peace party of the left and the rising isolationists of the right.
Calling someone an isolationist isn’t a devastating quip or even an accurate descriptor. Rather it’s the answer to a question that’s been looming over the bombadiers of yesterday’s right: How do they effectively label their fellow Republicans who oppose action in Syria? The old Iraq pejoratives—”unpatriotic,” “quisling”—are no longer effective. “Realist,” “moderate,” and “skeptic” sound downright reasonable. But “isolationist”—there’s a word with a whiff of the right-wing fringe. So-called isolationists like Sen. Robert Taft wrongly opposed American involvement in World War II. (Taft also opposed the internment of Japanese Americans, but let’s not let nuance intrude here.) Thus we get writers like Stephens drawing a tortuous line between Taft and Republicans who oppose intervention in Syria today. Concerned that America is taking al Qaeda’s side in Syria? You’re in the tradition of those who turned a blind eye to Hitler. The vast majority of conservatives who question the current military action don’t want a return to Fortress America. But it’s far more convenient for writers like Stephens to hurl the I-word than to acknowledge that many on the right feel chastened by the mistakes of Iraq and are leaving the interventionist block party in droves.
But this presents a further problem: Large majorities of the American people are opposed to intervening in Syria. Screaming “Isolationist!” is meant to relegate someone to the fringe; it can’t be applied to more than 60 percent of the public. So Americans are said to be falling for isolationist rhetoric because they’re “war weary.” There’s something like condescension embedded in the “war weary” formulation—if only Americans would wake up and start thinking clearly, they’d come around to supporting more bombs over the Middle East. For more on why the public isn’t, in fact, war weary, read Robert Samuelson’s excellent refutation.

Bikers denied no-stop permit for 9/11 rally through D.C. but will ride anyway

The nation’s capital has denied a “no stop” permit for the “2 Million Bikers to DC” rally on Wednesday, meant to “remember those who were killed on 9/11 and honor our armed forces.”

The group said in a statement Sunday that D.C. officials denied their request for a special nonstop ride through town with a waiver for red lights, stop signs and other traffic signals.


“What could have been a one or two hour ride through will now likely be an all day event,” the group said.
Denial of the permit sparked outrage on the biker group’s website because the District of Columbia reportedly has granted the American Muslim Political Action Committee a permit for the Million Americans Against Fear rally, formerly known as the Million Muslim March, for Wednesday on the National Mallthe PAC announced Saturday.

BizPac Review points out that the Muslim advocacy group also announced it had received a commitment from Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, Missouri Democrat, to speak at the event.

The 2 Million Bikers to DC group offered an apology to D.C. residents, who will undoubtedly be disturbed by the noise.

Via: Washington Times


Continue Reading....

Popular Posts