Three elections across the globe deliver an unpleasant shock to liberal ideologues.
Three elections in the last week have challenged long-held liberal premises about how elections are fought and what the public wants. It’s worth examining those results in such widely separated places as Australia, Norway, and the Rocky Mountains of Colorado.
In Colorado, liberals are already in denial about the fact that two Democratic state senators were recalled from office in districts Barack Obama carried by some 20 percentage points only ten months ago. The recalls were organized by citizens upset with the lawmakers’ votes in favor of a gun-control measure. The two senators also helped pass bills perceived as being against the interests of rural areas and helped push through a fraud-prone election law that shifted the Centennial State to all-mail voting.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Democratic National Committee’s chairwoman, said the results simply reflected “voter suppression, pure and simple.” Matt Vespa of Red State scoffed at her flimsy explanation: More Democrats and independents signed the two recall petitions than did Republicans, he noted, which “only further discredits DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s insane claim that her side lost due to voter suppression.”
Liberals are also claiming that the black arts of the National Rifle Association skewed the results. But the gun-rights group came very late to support the recalls, and the Denver Post reports that pro-gun-control groups spent some $3 million versus only $540,000 by recall supporters.
Grover Norquist, a board member of the National Rifle Association, claims once again that liberals mistook “position for passion” on an issue. In the wake of the Newtown massacre of last December, the Left believed public opinion had finally turned in favor of gun control; in support of this view, they cited surveys showing overwhelming support for background checks and limits on ammunition magazines. As Michael Tomasky of the Daily Beast wrote, “You cannot oppose the will of 90 percent of the public and expect no consequences.”
Via: National Review Online
Continue Reading....
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
MOSCOW – Russia dramatically escalated its denunciations of American threats to attack Syrian military targets on Saturday, as President V...
-
Throughout the online battles over Kim Davis, the counterfactual I’m most presented with is along the lines of the following: “You wouldn’...
-
Impending military strikes in Syria have invited comparisons to the Iraq lead-up ten years ago, but members of the Bush administration ha...
-
The new health care law promises all sorts of free benefits -- but analysts argue nothing is ultimately free, and ObamaCare is no exception....
-
Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren is bringing her name and fundraising prowess to Oregon next week to help her fellow Democrat, Jeff ...
-
Oprah Winfrey has said racism is still a problem around the world and the only way for it to end is for generations of racists to die out. ...
-
Before a single down has been played, we have already witnessed the biggest upset of the National Football League's season. Ju...
-
(CNSNews.com) – In the latest undercover investigative video of Planned Parenthood, a biotech CEO says her company could handle deliver...
-
One week after a disappointing loss in the closely watched Florida special election , national Democrats expect brighter news from the to...
No comments:
Post a Comment