Remember Michael Whaley? He’s a Marine vet that went on a tirade against #BlackLivesMatter and their violent and hateful rhetoric. His video went viral (and rightly so). It’s an awesome message and one that BLM needs to take to heart.
Whaley was interviewed by Megyn Kelly about his video and he got to expand on his original thoughts -
When it comes to Hillary Clinton’s crimes, she thinks it’s a big joke. What’s more, she told a group at the Iowa Democratic Wing Ding Friday that all of this talk over her emails and private servers and Benghazi is a bunch of hogwash. Republicans are just “playing politics,” and she refuses to sink so low.
“And you know what, it’s not about emails or servers, either,” she said. “It’s about politics.”
“I won’t play politics with national security or dishonor the memories of those we’ve lost. I won’t pretend that that is anything other than what it is — the same old partisan games we’ve seen so many times before.”
And she would know ALL about oldness. And playing partisan games.
On Saturday night, Pirro slammed Hillary and explained the legal case against her in detail, fact by fact. She goes as far as listing off the statutes that Hillary may have violated, including the one that prosecuted Gen. David Petraeus.
Hear her case below. It’s pretty compelling to anyone with a brain.
“I’ve got news for you. We don’t need intent,” she said. “It is a federal crime to negligently handle classified information.”
We can't let Hillary NEAR the White House. She’s a terrible human being and unfit for the presidency. Fact.
I'll be honest, I had no idea this movie was even being made until I saw the trailer -
Holy cow. This may be one Michael Bay movie that I actually put down money to go see (how in the WORLD a movie like this got past the liberal Hollywood gatekeepers, I will never know).
Dana Perino was on "The Kelly File" to talk about the potential impact this movie could have on Hillary Clinton's campaign and she makes some pretty good points about it -
Here's the thing about Michael Bay - critics don't like his movies. Shoot, I don't like his movies. But people go see his movies, regardless of what critics or the Hollywood elites say. Whether it's Pearl Harbor or Transformers or Ninja Turtles (which he only produced but, details), his movies are very successful at the box office. I'm sure plenty of low-info types are going to be looking through their movie options in January (which, there's rarely ANYTHING good playing at the theaters in January. Other than a bunch of pretentious Oscar-bait trash), and they'll be all "Hey - a new Michael Bay movie's out! Let's go see it!" And they will go see this movie. And they will see "This is a True Story." And they will hear the story of what happened in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Many of them will be hearing about this for the first time.
Like Dana said, we don't know anything about the movie other than the trailer. Hillary could come out of this looking like a hero or a villain. Or she might not even be mentioned in the movie. But it's an opportunity to get the truth out.
According to this, if you're a taxpayer, you're about to get screwed again. But if you're a person who gets one of those Obamaphones? You're about to be as delighted as this young lady:
The FCC is "proposing to expand its Lifeline program to help subsidize Internet service for low-income Americans." It's a $1.7 billion program, and Republicans are against it, naturally, because there's a crap-ton of "waste and inefficiencies" in it.
I'll wait over here while you stop being shocked at the government wasting your hard-earned money.
The update has been made a "priority" now, because it needs to "adapt to current technology." Basically, we're talking about upgrades to smartphones, y'all.
Yep:
One senior FCC official noted...that studies have shown smartphone use is popular with low-income individuals.
You think they're popular with low-income individuals, FCC? Really?
I'm super-hoping that they used taxpayer money to do the studies to figure THAT genius information out, because wow.
But at least they're making some reforms to the program:
The commission will ask if establishing a "neutral third party administrator" would be better than having telecom companies handling sensitive customer information they would not otherwise have. The commission will also ask if the overall program should be capped with a budget.
In the meantime, the proposal would require providers to maintain customers' eligibility information to help with oversight. The proposal would also require companies to retain records for 10 years.
It's such a huge relief that these customers won't have any of their private information shared with anyone, and I can't believe there is a commission that has to ASK if the program should HAVE A BUDGET.
This is why we can't have nice things ("we" meaning taxpayers...the folks in this program will more than likely get killer smartphones...you know).
Just thought I'd let y'all know that when you're busy getting ready to go back to work tomorrow (some of us work seven days a week, who am I kidding?), you need to really get fired up and put some pep in that step. There's a person out there that is depending on you to get them a really awesome smartphone sometime in the near future.
