Massachusetts revenue, welfare, transportation, environmental agencies hit by early retirements

BOSTON — The Massachusetts Department of Revenue, tasked with collecting state taxes, is losing 289 employees, or 15 percent of its total workforce, as part of a state budget-saving measure.

Auditors and tax examiners are among those taking an early retirement incentive.

The Department of Revenue plans to publish information later this week on how it will deal with the changes.

Gov. Charlie Baker proposed, and the Legislature approved, an early retirement incentive that was meant to save the state money by trimming the state workforce. Now that those workers have retired, effective June 30, 2,478 public employees have left state service, according to Massachusetts Comptroller Thomas Shack.

As expected, some agencies were harder hit than others – including the Department of Revenue, the Department of Transportation, the department that oversees welfare, the Department of Environmental Protection and several Health and Human Service agencies. Some of these jobs could be backfilled, as the Baker administration has the authority to use up to 20 percent of the savings to hire new people into the vacant positions.

Brendan Moss, a spokesman for the Executive Office of Administration and Finance, said state government will be able to deal with the losses. "We are continuing to work closely with all state agencies affected to ensure it will have minimal impact on state services," Moss said.

Baker pointed out that he had expected 4,500 people to retire. "We had planned for a larger number of people to leave state service than actually did, and I actually feel at this point that we're in reasonably good shape," Baker said Monday.

Via: Mass Live

Continue Reading....

California: Long Beach says it has achieved total pension reform

The city of Long Beach is announcing that it has achieved pension changes for all city employees after reaching a tentative agreement that asks four of the city’s bargaining units to increase the amount employees pay into their retirements.

The contracts represent the final piece of nearly three years of negotiations with nine unions that sought to lower pension costs as the city struggled financially.

Since 2007, the city has eliminated 786 positions and slashed $134 million from its general fund.

“Long Beach has become a smaller, more nimble organization…but we needed to address an issue of inequality in the city organization and compensate our remaining employees fairly,” Mayor Bob Foster said in a press release Monday.

Aside from the few dozen employees who received a raise in 2009, most of the 800 workers covered by the new contracts had not received raises since 2008. Foster said the new contracts help bring the employees’ pension contributions and salaries in line with other workers.

Employees covered under the new contracts will now contribute 8% of their salary into CalPERS, an increase from the 2% they previously paid. As part of the deal, they will also receive a 5% raise this month, followed by a 4% increase next year.

After more than a decade of painful cuts, city officials said they expect a healthier economy and improving budget situation to offset some of the resulting costs. Long Beach recently projected a surplus of $3.5 million for the 2014 fiscal year, its first in 10 years.

The contracts cover about 14% of the city’s workforce, including engineers, lifeguards, management, and confidential employees who assist in contract negotiations between the city and other employees.

The city struck pension deals with the city’s police and firefighters in 2011, and approved new contracts with the city’s largest union, the International Assn. of Machinists, in January.

In those deals, the retirement age and formula to calculate pension payouts for most existing employees remain unchanged – most continue to receive 2.5% of their salary as pension for each year on the job and are eligible to retire at 55.

However, new employees will receive 2% for each year, and would have to wait until age 62 to retire.

All together, the city expects its new contracts to save them $250 million across all funds, and $130 million in the general fund, over 10 years.

Via: Los Angeles Times

Continue Reading,,,,,