What does ‘top-down economics’ really mean?
“We can’t afford more top-down economics. What we need are policies that will grow and strengthen the middle class.” — Barack Obama
“Top-down economics” is a hijacked phrase. Objectively, it should be the label assigned to rule-of-czar capitalism steered by government officials. Instead, campaign rhetoric has been assigning it to rule-of-law capitalism driven by consumers and entrepreneurs—supposedly a system steered by the already-rich, in which money gradually trickles down to the middle class.
As vivid as that image may be, it is a false depiction of what really happens in a properly functioning private sector. But once the false image captures the attention of enough voters, it’s a simpler step for political entrepreneurs to sell themselves as the better alternative—simpler, that is, than having to compete against the way a vibrant private sector actually works.
Entrepreneurs cause money to gush outward, not to ‘trickle down’
There is little disagreement that today’s economy needs more private-sector jobs, and there should be little disagreement that private-sector entrepreneurs are more effective creators of new jobs than politicians are. But entrepreneurial success requires three ingredients: New ideas, sufficient drive, and adequate funding. With all three, entrepreneurs can develop new products and bring them to market, creating lasting new jobs when that process succeeds.
Unfortunately, it’s the rule rather than the exception that the typical entrepreneur lacks the third necessary ingredient: Adequate funding. He or she may possess the idea and the initiative, but the necessary funding must come from an outside source.
Should the government use higher taxation to forcibly extract additional money from the already-prosperous, then somehow allocate it back into the private sector as the bureaus and agencies see fit?
At the macro level, solving the problem of creating millions of new private-sector jobs requires matching thousands of potentially successful entrepreneurs with the funding they need. When this match is made, the typical entrepreneur—far from starting out rich and then deciding to let money “trickle down”— starts by deciding to take on a big risk, then obtains the funding, and then dishes out a gusher of other people’s money to new suppliers and new employees. If unsuccessful, the entrepreneur is the first one to go broke; if successful, he or she is the last one to benefit. In short, the money gushes outward long before success or failure for the risk-taker becomes evident, and therefore long before the entrepreneur can be judged “rich” or “poor.”
|
Showing posts with label Top-down. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Top-down. Show all posts
Sunday, September 2, 2012
‘Top-Down’ vs. ‘Bottom-Up’
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
A new leaked document from the Department of Veterans Affairs indicates 238,657 veterans have died while waiting for health care appointme...
-
The Republican National Committee has launched a website showing Obamacare’s impact on individual states, the party announced Wednesday. ...
-
The family of a woman killed during a mass shooting at the Washington Navy Yard in September is seeking $37.5 million from the Navy and ...
-
Christmas came early for the Republicans as House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi – the most repulsive figure in American politics, although S...
-
WASHINGTON/TOKYO (Reuters) - The United States advised its commercial airlines to notify Chinese authorities of flight plans when travellin...
-
Many of our current Oregon legislators went to college at a time when our public universities were very affordable and students could co...
-
Veterans retreating from Barack Obama President Barack Obama is trying hard to win veterans, but it looks like they’d prefer a new ...
-
At this weekend’s state party convention at the Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport , a group of influential California Republicans has...
-
The Obamacare wrecking ball is not only skyrocketing premiums, but destroying healthcare jobs as well: Via: The Right Scoop ...
-
Two GOP Senators are demanding clarification on what security measures were in place for U.S. personnel there after reports that those w...