Via: California Political Review
Showing posts with label Santa Claus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Santa Claus. Show all posts
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Friday, December 6, 2013
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
The Uncharitable Joe Biden: Better at Giving Away Your Money Than His
Before he became Vice President, Joe Biden was not exactly Santa Claus. So, one thing I think you will not see during the Vice President debates is a discussion on charity—Joe will not want to discuss this at all.
Just when I thought that there was no politician stingier than Barack Obama—who, before he became President, gave as little as .6% of his income to the poor—lo and behold Obama picked as his running mate, a man who gives far less to the poor than he. While Obama’s tax returns prior to his 2008 election reveal a portrait of a man who privately gives very little to the poor—less than any Republican I know—Joe Biden gives even less.
In fact, Biden’s charitable giving is so abysmally poor that he makes even Obama look like Santa Claus. Biden may well have been the stingiest man in the Senate. For two of the most “liberal” senators in Washington, they were embarrassingly conservative when it comes to reaching into their own pockets and helping the poor, whose cause they pretend to champion. If they thought that the public actually knew how little they did privately to help the poor, these two hypocrites would never again spout their populist drivel about Republican “trickle down” economics or criticize the Republicans for not doing enough to help the poor.
A close look at his returns reveals the true depths of their hypocrisy.
From 1998 through his election in 2008, Joe Biden’s income varied between $200,000 and $400,000. Where I come from, that is serious money
. Yet, amazingly, his reported annual charitable giving—as shown on his Schedule A—varied between a whopping $120 during the lean years and a little less than $400 when he felt extra charitable. [The rare exception was 2007, when he was running for office and gave a less than generous $995 to the poor.] No, I have not missed a decimal place. He does not give in terms of five figures, nor does he give in terms of four figures. At least before he became Vice President.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
(CNSNews.com) – Last week, Rep. Lois Capps (D-Calif.) introduced a bill that would remove the words “husband” and “wife” from the langu...
-
ITS NOT WHAT IT APPEARS TO BE! Consumer Financial Protection Bureau officials are seeking to monitor four out of every five U.S. consu...
-
The federal government is hiring what it calls a "Behavioral Insights Team" that will look for ways to subtly influence people...
-
Just hours after four U.S. Marines were shot and killed by Islamic terrorist Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez in Chattanooga Thursday, the Whit...
-
WASHINGTON — It came two days after the announcement of the nuclear agreement with Iran, yet little mention was made on July 16 of the 70...
-
It's a batting average that won't land the federal marketplace for Obamacare into the Healthcare Hall of Fame. As few as 1 in 100...
-
Fresh off a victory lap in the Rose Garden where the #LOVEWINS president narcissistically defined agreeing with him as “love,” President ...
-
When the law no longer commands respect, one can pretty well write off a nation that pretends to be a constitutional republic. But how can ...
-
The number of women not in the labor force reached a record high in July, according to data released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statist...
-
Ed Schultz claimed that conservative ownership over nearly every media entity is part of the reason why the recent coverage on Obamacare...
