Showing posts with label conservatism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conservatism. Show all posts
Thursday, October 24, 2013
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
Congressional Republicans: Hail Ceaser!
Republicans should support some version of the authorization of force resolution. They should do so even if they think that the President’s policy will prove ineffective, do no good, waste money, or entail unforeseen risks; they should do so even if they think he has gotten the nation into this situation by blunders, fecklessness, arrogance, or naiveté; and they should so even if, and especially, if they have no confidence in his judgment. The simple fact is that the nation and our allies will be at further risk if the world sees a presidency that is weakened and that has no credibility to act. Partisans may be tempted to see such a result as condign punishment for the President’s misjudgments; they may feel that he deserves to pay the price for his hypocrisy and cheap and demagogic attacks on his predecessor. But at the end of the day, Republicans need to rise above such temptations; the stakes are too high. The weaker the president’s credibility on the world scene, the more the need to swallow and do what will not weaken it further. President Obama is the only president we have. That remains the overriding fact.
And there is the important matter of the future–a future that may one day have a Republican in the presidency. The precedent of setting too low a threshold for blocking presidential initiative in foreign affairs is unwise. Of course Congress has the right, even the obligation, to stop action that member of the legislature believe would be disastrous. But short of that, it is wiser to maintain a good deal of discretion in the presidency. In the case at hand, all of the hyperbole about war aside, the real objection is that the President’s policy will prove to be ineffective or humiliating, not disastrous. That is not sufficient reason to weaken the discretion of the president or open the door next time to more gratuitous partisanship by the Democrats....
Republican who vote for an authorization of force resolution do not have to endorse the wisdom of the President’s policy. They can make clear their doubts and state their objections. They can make known that they are supporting the presidency and presidential credibility, not necessarily the wisdom of the policy. They can say that they are acting in a constitutional spirit, exercising the kind of judgment that is appropriate to the legislature in foreign policy, and no more. They can sign on to the president’s discretion to act without signing on to his actions. Via: The Weekly Standard
Continue Reading...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Coburn made the comment during an event for the New York Young Republican Club, the newspaper reported . "There's no comity wi...
-
Because Hillary Clinton officially joined the presidential race last Sunday afternoon, many consider the 2016 primaries to officially be...
-
Towns all over Britain are blowing millions of dollars on wind turbines that are generating almost no revenue and will take hundreds of y...
-
The same-sex “marriage” vote in Ireland marks the largest victory for the LGBT movement thus far. It’s quite a feather in the gay boa – an...
-
On Sunday’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” on ABC, Washington Post columnist George Will took on proponents of federal assistance...
-
Unemployment rates rose in nearly all large U.S. cities in June as college graduates and many of those still in school began searching for...
-
“Do not foist Brian Williams on MSNBC,” he begged in a headline. Doesn’t MSNBC have enough problems? Someone inside the network must t...
-
This is what happens when the two parties ruling Washington lose touch with America and pander to their crazy-extreme bases: President Ob...
-
Pope Francis has said the Catholic Church is too focused on preaching about abortion, gay people and contraception and needs to become more...
-
WASHINGTON – President Obama defended his controversial health care legislation Friday, calling Republican efforts to repeal it an “ideol...