Monday, August 17, 2015

Cop Pistol-Whipped With Own Gun Didn’t Shoot Attacker For Fear Of Making Headlines

Pictures of a wounded Birmingham, Ala., police officer were posted online by law enforcement critics who mocked the wounded cop.
The Alabama police officer who went viral after he was pistol-whipped with his own gun last week said he didn't shoot his attacker because he didn't want to make headlines as the nation's newest vilified cop.
The Birmingham detective, whose name has not yet been released, paused while a suspect attacked him during a traffic stop because he feared the country-wide backlash he might receive for killing a black man, the head of the local police union said Friday.
"Local law enforcement officers are walking on egg shells because they're so hesitant of how to interact because of what's taking place in the media," police Sgt. Heath Boackle, president of the Fraternal Order of Police, told the Daily News.
"They're losing these confrontations," he added. "He who hesitates is lost."
Images of the bloodied officer lying limp and face-down on the ground quickly went viral after witnesses dispersed them on social media, where the wounded deputy was heavily mocked by cop critics.
"Pistol whipped his ass to sleep," one Facebook user wrote.
The plainclothes Birmingham cop was investigating a string of burglaries when he stopped a GMC Yukon and was attacked by the driver who immediately got out of his vehicle, authorities said.
The suspect, 34-year-old Janard Cunningham, allegedly stole the detective's gun during the struggle and clubbed him repeatedly with it.

ARE REAGAN DEMOCRATS BECOMING TRUMP DEMOCRATS?

Are Reagan Democrats Becoming Trump Democrats? | The American Spectator
The Gallup poll. December, 1979.

President Jimmy Carter — 60%. Former California Governor Ronald Reagan — 36%. So confident was Carter White House Chief of Staff Hamilton Jordan of the coming year’s presidential election that he boasted: “The American people are not going to elect a seventy-year-old, right-wing, ex-movie actor to be president.” Hamilton Jordan was a smart guy — and he was also wildly wrong. A little less than a year later the American people — ignoring that Gallup poll — elected Ronald Reagan to the presidency in a landslide — in a three-way race. Reagan won 50.8% of the vote to Carter’s 41%. Third party candidate John Anderson, a liberal Republican who had been defeated by Reagan in the GOP primaries, won a mere 6.6% of the vote. Reagan carried 44 states to Carter’s six plus the District of Columbia.

What happened? How could Reagan go from losing a Gallup poll to Carter by 24 points — then winning the actual election by almost 10 points? Answer? The emergence of what would become known to political history as “the Reagan Democrats.” Who were they? Blue collar, working class, largely Catholic and ethnic, they originally emerged in Richard Nixon’s 1968 and 1972 elections. In which Nixon referred to them as the “Silent Majority.” In 1980, angered by Carter’s handling of the economy, the feckless handling of the Iran hostage crisis, and the left-wing tilt of the Democrats, these voters — many of whom had voted for John F. Kennedy twenty years earlier — returned with a vengeance. Famously, Macomb County, Michigan, which cast 63% of its vote for JFK in 1960, turned around in 1980 and voted 66% for Reagan.

On Tuesday night of this week, Donald Trump appeared in Birch Run, Michigan in Saginaw County. Here’s the headline from the Detroit Free Press:
A lovefest for Donald Trump in Birch Run
The story begins:
BIRCH RUN, Mich. — Addressing about 2,000 very enthusiastic people at the Birch Run Expo Center, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump touched on everything from immigration, China, the military, Obamacare and his Republican opponents. 
The crowd, some coming from outside of Michigan, ate it up, giving him frequent standing ovations and breaking into chants of “Trump, Trump, Trump!” and “U.S.A, U.S.A.”
The obvious question. Are Reagan Democrats returning to the center of the American political scene — this time known as Trump Democrats?
A new CNN poll in Iowa has some very revealing stats. The poll notes:
Donald Trump has a significant lead in the race to win over likely Iowa caucus-goers, according to the first CNN/ORC poll in the state this cycle. Overall, Trump tops the field with 22% and is the candidate seen as best able to handle top issues including the economy, illegal immigration and terrorism. He’s most cited as the one with the best chance of winning the general election, and, by a wide margin, as the candidate most likely to change the way things work in Washington.


[Commentary] How to settle the A-10 retirement standoff

A-10s
The best way to resolve the A-10 retirement debate is to satisfy both sides with a solution that eliminates the operational and economic arguments driving it.
The primary vocal critics of the Air Force decision to retire the A-10 close-support aircraft are Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., and freshman Rep. Martha McSally, R-Ariz. All three have strong ties to the A-10. Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona, is home to the largest A-10 base. Closure of the base would have serious economic impact. Ayotte’s husband is a former A-10 pilot. McSally flew A-10s in the Air Force.
The Air Force has presented strong operational arguments defending the retirement of the A-10: Other aircraft perform the A-10’s close-support mission today with the same effectiveness, and more survivability. The A-10 can only perform close support whereas other aircraft can perform close support and other missions, thus offering more value in a smaller Air Force. And with today’s precision weapons and automation, pilots can train for both close support and other roles without sacrificing effectiveness.
Former A-10 pilots argue from an emotional point of view citing personal experiences. With the strong support of McCain, Ayotte and McSally, they have organized a support group and congressional contingent advocating retention.
But they have been unable to shoot down the rationale the Air Force puts forth in defense of retiring the A-10. Their arguments are laden with shrill, emotional points of view, but are mostly anecdotal and unpersuasive when measured against objective, logical reasoning.
Moreover, this impasse is having adverse impacts on Air Force plans to field the F-35. To continue to operate the fleet of A-10s, it is necessary to forgo building up the maintenance force necessary to field the F-35. This slows the development of proficiency in Air Force F-35 pilots and, consequently, the operational readiness and competence of F-35 squadrons.
It also forces the Air Force to alter its rhythm to balance training, operational readiness and deployment commitments, creating a problem for combatant commanders who depend on having the F-35 in overseas theaters.
But there is a way to resolve this annual fight between the Air Force and A-10 advocates in the Army and Congress.
The Army likes the A-10 not just because of its attack capabilities but even more so because it is totally dedicated to close support of Army forces. The Army fears that without the A-10, and even though other aircraft can perform close support satisfactorily, the Air Force will not be there when needed.
To ensure the Army can depend on Air Force close support, the Air Force and Army should agree to negotiate a formal compact to team Air Force squadrons and controllers with Army brigades. Squadrons of F-16s, B-52s, B-1s and, soon, F-35s would be required to allocate a portion of their training to exercise and deploy with specific Army units. This teaming concept is not new but has not been enforced to the extent of this proposal.
An added benefit would be the close, symbiotic relationship that would bond the units, boosting team esprit and combat effectiveness, potentially more than exists today with the A-10.
To satisfy economic issues motivating opponents, the Air Force needs to ensure that Davis-Monthan — the A-10’s master base with more than 80 A-10s and 4,000 jobs — remains a major Air Force installation and economic engine in Arizona. It must, therefore, replace the A-10s with another operational mission at the base and at smaller Air National Guard A-10 locations.
Because the Air Force will likely retain its existing bombers, it will need at least one other big base with large ramps, a long runway and modern facilities for its new stealth bomber, the Long Range Strike Bomber. Dispersal of bombers, particularly nuclear bombers, is also necessary for nuclear deterrence to work. There is no bomber base in the southwest. Davis-Monthan would be an excellent choice.
Davis-Monthan could also be a home for the KC-46A tanker, or the upcoming T-X trainer. Since Luke Air Force Base near Phoenix is already a new F-35 training base, Arizona would then retain its two large bases with new, important Air Force missions, thus mitigating economic concerns.
For smaller Air National Guard A-10 units, the Air Force can find new missions as it does routinely during drawdowns and equipment changes.
The standoff between the Air Force and congressional opponents has become debilitating. Both sides need to work together for an amicable solution. Teaming Army and Air Force units for close support and replacing A-10s with new aircraft at Davis-Monthan are win-win for both. 
Retired Gen. John Michael Loh is a former Air Force vice chief of staff and former commander of Air Combat Command.

[OPINION] Stories such as Ferguson are difficult to discuss as news, not opinion

2014_YEAREND_REVIEW_139
By far the story I’ve spoken with readers about the most this week was the centerpiece of the Sunday print edition. It was a look at how the U.S. has changed in the year since the death of Michael Brown in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson.
It included a variety of voices and data, and explored such uneasy topics as attitudes toward law enforcement among different racial groups. Some of those quoted were positive, and others negative.
The most common complaint was voiced by one emailer today:
“To say that Michael Brown was ‘…the unarmed black 18-year-old shot by white police officer Darren Wilson...’ is like saying Donald Trump is running for president. There is an awful lot that is unsaid. The facts of the Michael Brown shooting should not be ignored.”
I can’t argue with that though Brown’s death was really the taking-off point for the story. It didn’t attempt to recount the incident, which has been done ad nauseum over the past year.
But that goes two ways. Many of the readers I spoke to wanted the story to underline that Michael Brown had been seen on security footage strong-arming a convenience store clerk, and that he had alleged, but unproven, juvenile criminal records.
None of this information is new of course. But on the other hand, telling the “whole story” also means that facts about Darren Wilson that his supporters may be uncomfortable with as well should be included, including details about his attitudes on race from a recent New Yorker interview that many critics have found troubling.
This is one of those news events where I’ve felt readers really end up discussing their feelings about the case, rather than the journalism surrounding it. We all tend to impose good guy/bad guy thinking on these stories, where the truth often is that both sides bore at least some culpability in the outcome.
The one knock against this story and others like it is one I haven’t heard from readers, but I’ve thought myself: People on all sides of the issue are making some pretty big leaps in lumping too many incidents together when they really share very little in common.
The death of Trayvon Martin at the hands of a civilian has very little relationship to the question of others who have died in altercations with police officers. Those are matters of public policy and safety, while Martin’s death — while undeniably tragic — was caused by a private citizen, and really never should have become international news.
And further, the individual cases of other black people while in fights with police or under arrest are themselves disparate. I’ve argued many times that news events aren’t fiction, and there’s no such thing as symbolism or other narratives techniques there. It cheapens each of these people’s stories to weave them into an imaginary storyline, and journalists should be careful about drawing any parallels.
Via: Kansas City Star
Continue Reading.....






Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/public-editor/article31136117.html#storylink=cpy

[VIDEO] Facts Are Facts: This Is The Best Case Against Hillary You'll Hear, Hands Down

When it comes to Hillary Clinton’s crimes, she thinks it’s a big joke. What’s more, she told a group at the Iowa Democratic Wing Ding Friday that all of this talk over her emails and private servers and Benghazi is a bunch of hogwash. Republicans are just “playing politics,” and she refuses to sink so low.
“And you know what, it’s not about emails or servers, either,” she said. “It’s about politics.”
“I won’t play politics with national security or dishonor the memories of those we’ve lost. I won’t pretend that that is anything other than what it is — the same old partisan games we’ve seen so many times before.”
And she would know ALL about oldness. And playing partisan games.
On Saturday night, Pirro slammed Hillary and explained the legal case against her in detail, fact by fact. She goes as far as listing off the statutes that Hillary may have violated, including the one that prosecuted Gen. David Petraeus.
Hear her case below. It’s pretty compelling to anyone with a brain.

“I’ve got news for you. We don’t need intent,” she said. “It is a federal crime to negligently handle classified information.”
We can't let Hillary NEAR the White House. She’s a terrible human being and unfit for the presidency. Fact. 

[CARTOON] McClatchy cartoons for the week of Aug. 9, 2015

Ben Carson: People Are Beginning To Realzie That "Same Old, Same Old" Will Take Us To The Same Place

Sunday, August 16, 2015

Hotel for President Obama's Ethiopia Visit Cost $412K

President Obama visited Kenya and Ethiopia during his recent trip to Africa, and the hotel bill for the president and his entourage totaled approximately $412,390.86 for the Ethiopia stay alone. A contract with the Hilton in the Ethiopian capital of Addis Ababa was posted online recently:
 

The president arrived in Addis Ababa on Sunday, July 26 and departed on July 28. The government also spent $7,540 for cell phones for the president's Ethiopia visit. The White House did not respond to a request for an explanation.

De Blasio is padding City Hall with jobs for all of his friends

Mayor de Blasio’s patronage mill is churning out junk jobs funded with taxpayer money for longtime pals, campaign grunts and acolytes.
In addition to creating a $150,000 post for Stephanie Yazgi — the longtime girlfriend of his top strategist, Emma Wolfe — de Blasio has created positions to amp up his progressive agenda and national profile and spread propaganda touting his “transcendent” accomplishments.
The city’s television station — led by de Blasio buddy Janet Choi — devotes much of its taxpayer-funded $5.7 million budget to broadcasting his ribbon-cuttings, announcements and features about his friends, including his wedding singer.
His $105,000 digital director, Jessica Singleton, shapes his social-media image while his $69,000 media analyst, Mahen Gunaratna, measures the influence of his messages.
But the bulk of his buddies land jobs at City Hall in the mayor’s Community Affairs Unit.
The CAU traditionally had staffers represent the mayor at community-board and civic-group meetings across the city, reporting back to the administration on neighborhood concerns.
“The CAU has now turned into a four-year organizing arm of the de Blasio campaign,” said a former liaison with the unit.
Stephanie Yazgi, Emma Wolfe, Janet Choi and Jessica Singleton
Photo: Facebook ; Rob Bennett for the Office of Mayor Bill de Blasio (2) ; Assoc. Commissioner at New York City Mayor's Office of Media and Entertainment
The unit now employs Pinny Ringel, a $65,000-a-year liaison to the Jewish community and a former Public Advocate’s Office staffer under de Blasio.
Sarah Sayeed is a liaison who specializes in the Muslim community. And Jonathan Soto is senior community liaison to the Clergy Advisory Council, another de Blasio creation.
Kicy Motley, a de Blasio campaign worker who tweeted “F- -k. The. Police.” in 2012, found a home in the CAU office as $55,000-a-year Brooklyn borough director.
And Rebecca Lynch, a Teamsters union lobbyist who backed de Blasio’s campaign, landed a gig as an $85,000-a-year special assistant in the CAU before taking a leave of absence to launch a bid for City Council in Queens.
De Blasio’s politicized CAU failed him in the Legionnaire’s disease outbreak, when there was a disconnect between City Hall and South Bronx community leaders.
“The CAU is supposed to know everything happening in the boroughs in every community,” said political consultant George Arzt. “There should have been briefings on what is going on and what they hear on the ground.”

[VIDEO] Donald Trump Releases Immigration Plan, Including Ending Birthright Citizenship

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump Sunday released his campaign’s immigration plan, which includes ending birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants.
“This remains the biggest magnet for illegal immigration,” Trump says in the plan posted on his website.
“We are the only country in the world whose immigration system puts the needs of other nations ahead of our own,” Trump also said. “That must change.”
Here is how Trump describes the three principles of his plan:
A nation without borders is not a nation. There must be a wall across the southern border.
A nation without laws is not a nation. Laws passed in accordance with our Constitutional system of government must be enforced.
A nation that does not serve its own citizens is not a nation. Any immigration plan must improve jobs, wages and security for all Americans.
Trump’s plan includes his frequent call to make Mexico pay for a wall across the southern border. “For many years, Mexico’s leaders have been taking advantage of the United States by using illegal immigration to export the crime and poverty in their own country (as well is in other Latin American countries),” Trump says.
Says Trump: “We will not be taken advantage of anymore.”
Trump is also calling for the government to triple the number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, mandate nationwide e-verify systems for employers, deport criminal illegal immigrants, end catch-and-release of people caught trying to enter the country illegaly, defund sanctuary cities and implement harsher penalties for immigrants overstaying visas.

Coulter: I Don’t Care If Donald Trump Performs Abortions in the White House

Conservative author Ann Coulter tweeted Sunday that Donald Trump’s immigration policy is so awesome, she doesn’t care if he performs abortions in the White House.
The tweet comes after Trump admitted in a Meet the Press interview that it’s possible he donated to Planned Parenthood in the past. Coulter has said that she believes abortion is murder.
She continued to praise Trump’s new policy paper, even comparing him to Ronald Reagan and his plan to the Magna Carta.
I don't care if wants to perform abortions in White House after this immigration policy paper.

[VIDEO] Gowdy: Clinton server 'sure as Hell' inconvenienced others

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said on Sunday that Hillary Clinton was only helping herself by using a private email server during her tenure as secretary of State.
“The notion she did this for convenience raises the question: ‘Convenient for who?’ ” he asked host Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday.”
“It may have been convenient for her, but it certainly wasn’t convenient for anyone else,” Gowdy added of the Democratic presidential candidate. “It sure as Hell hasn’t been convenient for the American people and the intelligence community.”
Clinton announced last week she is turning over her personal email server and its backup thumb drive to Justice Department investigators.
Gowdy, the House Benghazi Committee chairman, argued on Sunday that the probe of her server is not a partisan one.
“The Inspector General is not partisan,” he said. “The FBI is not partisan. She need not blame House Republicans for having her own private server.”
“I get she is frustrated,” Gowdy added. “Her poll numbers are tanking and people she never expected to enter the race are entering the race.”
The South Carolina lawmaker additionally criticized Clinton’s persistent reluctance toward relinquishing the device.
“I wish she had done this in March,” Gowdy said. “We would be much further down this road at this time.”
“Perhaps there was something on there she didn’t really want us to see,” he added. “Had she not had this email arrangement with herself, I would not be on your show this morning.”

Democrats Courting ‘Gold Standard’ to Unseat Young in Iowa

Democrats may be getting a candidate in Iowa’s only tossup congressional election — just not the one they’re ready for.
Iraq war veteran Jim Mowrer told CQ Roll Call on Friday that he’s “very seriously considering” challenging freshman Rep. David Young in the 3rd District and that he’s going to make a decision and an announcement “very soon.” Democrats in Iowa confirmed that he’s expected to announce his candidacy as early as next week.
If Mowrer’s name sounds familiar it’s because he ran in 2014 — in the 4th District, where despite impressive fundraising he lost to seven-term Rep. Steve King by 23 points.
Democrats aren’t altogether unhappy with Mowrer.
“There’s a lot of goodwill toward him for taking on King,” one Democrat with extensive knowledge of Iowa politics said.
Mowrer ran in the 4th District in 2014. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo).
Mowrer ran in the 4th District in 2014. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo)
It’s just that Democrats think they’ve got stronger potential candidates who some of them think should have right of first refusal.
“If he were to cool his jets, and let other candidates pass, then I think there’d be a Mowrer movement,” one Iowa Democratic operative said.
Meanwhile, Nick Klinefeldt, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Iowa, is the “gold standard in terms of a candidate,” the first source said.
Earlier this summer Klinefeldt suggested he was not going to run, but some Iowa Democrats are eagerly trying to convince him to get in, especially now that Mowrer seems to be going ahead with his candidacy.
“The door is cracked. It’s not open, but it’s certainly not closed,” the Iowa Democratic operative said of Klinefeldt’s consideration of the race, adding that his U.S. attorney tenure will soon be coming to a close.
With no voting record and a compelling record as a U.S. attorney, Democrats think Klinefeldt paints an easy contrast to Young. A one-time aide to former Sen. Tom Harkin, who recommended him for U.S. attorney, Klinefeldt has close ties to Harkin’s inner circle.
If he were to call donors and say, “I’m in,” the Iowa Democratic operative said, “those would not be cold calls.”
“If I were the DCCC [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee], I’d clone him then run him in a bunch of other places,” the same operative added.
His future political prospects, the operative said, may be part of what’s giving Klinefeldt pause about running.
“He will run for something, and he will be a star. So ‘when and where am I going to engage’ is what he’s trying to figure out.”
Although Mowrer was, by all accounts, a formidable candidate in the 4th District last cycle, he only moved into the 3rd District this spring (he bought a house there in 2007.)
“It was more of a personal decision with my family,” Mowrer said of his district-switching.
Among some Democrats, there’s a fear that Mowrer might not be able to raise the same kind of money he did in 2014 when he challenged King, a nationally known (and loathed by the left) Republican.
But Mowrer maintains that he has support where he needs it, including at the national level.
“I’ve got a great relationship with folks at the DCCC from my previous experience,” he told CQ Roll Call. “I’ve always been in touch with them in the last couple years, including recently. I will continue to have that relationship and continue to chat.”
“I think Young won in a fluke in 2014,” Mowrer said, chalking his loss up to the GOP wave. “There are a lot of things that I learned,” he said, adding that this cycle, he has an “even better idea of what it takes.”
But there’s another Democrat in the state who could shake things up. For a long time, it seemed former Gov. Chet Culver, despite alienating parts of the labor community during his tenure, would be the Democrat to beat given his high name recognition and ability to raise money. Three Democratic sources with knowledge of Iowa said that if Culver decided to get in, that could still be the case.
The problem is that Culver hasn’t made a move in one direction or the other (“He’s gone radio-silent,” one Democrat said), and that’s frustrating the party. He wasn’t included in a recent DCCC poll of the district that both Klinefeldt and Mowrer were.
“He’s squandered his window of opportunity,” the same Democrat added.
But “the rules don’t apply to him,” another Democrat said, suggesting that there’s no point at which it’d be too late for Culver to get in and possibly still clear the field.
Democrats have been slow to recruit in the 3rd District, where both parties consider Young vulnerable. The former chief of staff to Sen. Charles E. Grassley won by more than 10 points last November, but his district went for President Barack Obama by single-digit margins in 2008 and 2012. That’s enough to earn him a spot on the National Republican Congressional Committee’sPatriot Program and to get Democrats enthused about picking up his seat in a presidential year.
Earlier this week, state Sen. Matt McCoy, whom Democrats had tried to discourage from running, announced that he would not launch a bid.
Multiple Democratic sources said that the one Democrat who has declared his candidacy, businessman Desmund Adams, is not competitive.
“This is why the DCCC is boxed in,” said an Iowa Democrat in reference to the party’s delicate recruiting dance.
“Mowrer stepping up is a good thing — unless he chases one or two candidates out,” he said.
Correction 5:40 p.m.
An earlier version of this article misspelled Desmund Adams’ name.

Popular Posts