Showing posts with label 1996. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1996. Show all posts

Monday, September 30, 2013

WHO GETS CREDIT FOR A GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?

The End is Nigh. So say the media, counting down the seconds to a partial shutdown of the U.S. government. Certainly Americans will miss some federal functions, and the media will focus eagerly on victims--real and imaginary--of the impasse (though, curiously, the government clocks out for two days every weekend, and most people seem OK with that). At the same time, we will be reminded that life goes on beyond the state.

The enduring memory of the last shutdown, in 1996, is that the economy hummed right along despite the fact that the federal government was closed. Suddenly, much of government didn't seem so necessary after all. The American people proved quite adept at handling our own affairs in most matters. It was before--not after--that shutdown that President Bill Clinton told the nation that "the era of big government is over." 
Earlier this year, President Barack Obama warned Americans that the budget sequester--his idea, proposed during the debt ceiling negotiations of 2011--would create apocalyptic damage. That is still, basically, the White House line, blaming slow economic growth on spending restraint. No one buys it--and the president did himself considerable political damage by exaggerating the pain Americans would suddenly begin to feel.
The government shutdown may be a repeat. It forces Washington to do what it pretends is impossible--to prioritize among government functions, to designate some programs and even some departments as "non-essential." That causes some hurt feelings, but it is reality. And among those non-essential parts will be new opportunities for savings that Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi recently claimed simply aren't there.
This particular shutdown is complicated by the fact that it coincides with negotiations on the debt ceiling, which could have a direct impact on the stock market and the country's credit ratings. But there are some who are already predicting that the fight over a government shutdown could make a deal on the debt ceiling more likely, not less. And it is hard to measure damage to an economy already badly damaged by bad policy.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

CRS report: number of able-bodied adults on food stamps doubled after Obama suspended work requirement


Obama administration officials have insisted that their decision to grant states waivers to redefine work requirements for welfare recipients would not “gut” the landmark 1996 welfare reform law. But a new report from the Congressional Research Service obtained by the Washington Examiner suggests that the administration’s suspension of a separate welfare work requirement has already helped explode the number of able-bodied Americans on food stamps.
In addition to the broader work requirement that has become a contentious issue in the presidential race, the 1996 welfare reform law included a separate rule encouraging able-bodied adults without dependents to work by limiting the amount of time they could receive food stamps. President Obama suspended that rule when he signed his economic stimulus legislation into law, and the number of these adults on food stamps doubled, from 1.9 million in 2008 to 3.9 million in 2010, according to the CRS report, issued in the form of a memo to House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va.
“This report once again confirms that President Obama has severely gutted the welfare work requirements that Americans have overwhelmingly supported since President Clinton signed them into law,” Cantor said in an emailed statement. “It’s time to reinstate these common-sense measures, and focus on creating job growth for those in need.”

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Gingrich slams Obama on welfare revamp


Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich accused President Barack Obama and his “even more radical” appointees on Wednesday of plotting to destroy the work requirement in the 1996 welfare reform law.
Obama and his aides “have a real fight and it is a fight they can’t possibly win,” he said.
“This happens to be an issue that is devastating for liberals… [many voters are] really offended by government giving away money for nothing,” Gingrich said during a press conference arranged by the Republican National Committee.
Obama’s deputies are pushing back against Mitt Romney’s new focus on the July decision by the department of Health and Human Services to relax welfare-to-work rules.
Romney said Tuesday the change is an “insult” to hard-working Americans.
In July, HHS invited states to conduct “demonstration projects” that could exempt welfare recipients from long-standing work requirements.
Obama’s aides say the new proposal won’t reduce the popular requirement that welfare recipients also work, and they argue that officials will only approve projects that actually boost work rates by 20 percent.

Via: The Daily Caller

Continue Reading

Popular Posts