Showing posts with label Chelsea Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chelsea Clinton. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Sexism and Racism Are Leftism

In our time, sexism and racism have become the province of the rich.

 Discrimination by sex and by race are ancient innate pathologies and transcend particular cultures. But the American idea of sexism and racism in the 21st century — unfailing, endemic, and institutional discrimination by a majority-white-male-privileged culture against both women and so-called non-white minorities — has largely become a leftist construct. We can see how these two relativist -isms work in a variety of ways.

One, the frequent charge of racism and sexism is predicated not so much on one’s gender and race as on one’s gender, race, and politics. Certainly, few on the left worried much about the slurs against Sarah Palin during and after her vice-presidential run. America’s overclass in the media and leftist politics constructed a sexist portrait of a clueless white-trash mom in Wasilla, Alaska, mindlessly having lots of kids after barely graduating from the University of Idaho. Even Bill Maher’s and David Letterman’s liberal armor would not have withstood leftist thrusts had, mutatis mutandis, the former called Hillary Clinton a c–t or the latter disparaged Ms. Clinton as “slutty flight attendant” and joked that, when a teen, Chelsea Clinton had had sexual relations with a Yankee baseball player in the dugout. Ironically it was the by-her-own-bootstraps lower-middle-class Palin who braved the frontier, no-prisoners, male world to become governor of Alaska; in real terms, she is the true feminist. In contrast, according to doctrinaire feminism, Hillary Clinton does not measure up. She has largely clung, in mousy fashion, to her two-timing husband, excused his serial and manipulative philandering with young women of less clout and power, traded on his political nomenclature, and piggy-backed on his career.

Via: National Review


Continue Reading.....

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Tens Of Millions More In Undisclosed $$ For The Clintons

Last Night, The Clinton Foundation Revealed That It Had "Received As Much As $26.4 Million In Previously Undisclosed Payments From Major Corporations, Universities, Foreign Sources And Other Groups." "The Clinton Foundation reported Thursday that it has received as much as $26.4 million in previously undisclosed payments from major corporations, universities, foreign sources and other groups. The disclosure came as the foundation faced questions over whether it fully complied with a 2008 ethics agreement to reveal its donors and whether any of its funding sources present conflicts of interest for Hillary Rodham Clinton as she begins her presidential campaign." (Rosalind S. Helderman and Tom Hamburger, "Clinton Foundation Reveals Up To $26 Million In Additional Payments," The Washington Post , 5/21/15)
The Money Was From Speaking Fees, And "Foundation Officials Said The Funds Were Tallied Internally As 'Revenue' Rather Than Donations, Which Is Why They Had Not Been Included In The Public Listings Of Its Contributors Published As Part Of The 2008 Agreement." "The money was paid as fees for speeches by Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton. Foundation officials said the funds were tallied internally as 'revenue' rather than donations, which is why they had not been included in the public listings of its contributors published as part of the 2008 agreement." (Rosalind S. Helderman and Tom Hamburger, "Clinton Foundation Reveals Up To $26 Million In Additional Payments," The Washington Post , 5/21/15)
The Foundation Said It Had Not Previously Disclosed "Organizations That Paid For Clinton Speeches… Because They Were Paying For A Service And Not Making A Tax-Deductible Donation." "While the Clinton Foundation has annually disclosed its donors since 2008, the foundation said Thursday that organizations that paid for Clinton speeches have not before been included in those lists because they were paying for a service and not making a tax-deductible donation." (Rosalind S. Helderman and Tom Hamburger, "Clinton Foundation Reveals Up To $26 Million In Additional Payments," The Washington Post , 5/21/15)
  • "A Foundation Official Indicated The Speech Dollars Have Been Disclosed As Revenue In Annual Tax Filings To The IRS." (Rosalind S. Helderman and Tom Hamburger, "Clinton Foundation Reveals Up To $26 Million In Additional Payments," The Washington Post , 5/21/15)

Clinton's Personal Financial Disclosure Forms Raised Ethical Questions About "The Completeness Of Her Financial Disclosures"

Clinton Had Delivered 15 Previously Undisclosed Speeches Since January 2014."Hillary Clinton has delivered 15 such speeches, including one address to Goldman Sachs and another to JPMorgan Chase." (Rosalind S. Helderman and Tom Hamburger, "Clinton Foundation Reveals Up To $26 Million In Additional Payments,"The Washington Post , 5/21/15)
Clinton's Decision To Release "Details On Millions Of Dollars In Speaking Fees Sent To The Clinton Foundation Rather Than Her Own Pocket Is An Effort To Quiet An Ethical Debate About The Completeness Of Her Financial Disclosures…" "Hillary Clinton's decision to release this week details on millions of dollars in speaking fees sent to the Clinton Foundation rather than her own pocket is an effort to quiet an ethical debate about the completeness of her financial disclosures at a time when the foundation's finances and fundraising practices are under intense scrutiny." (Josh Gerstein, "Hillary's speech disclosures come under fire," Politico, 5/20/15)

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Chelsea’s difficult personality chasing out Clinton Foundation staffers, sources reveal

Chelsea’s chasing them out!

Sources near the Clinton Foundation are divulging inside secrets and attributing the organization’s high turnover rate to Chelsea Clinton’s difficult personality.

clinton 3
“A lot of people left because she was there. A lot of people left because she didn’t want them there,” a source told The New York Post’s Page Six.
“She is very difficult.”

Chelsea reportedly manipulates  top staffers like pieces on a checker board, prompting many to quit in disgust.
Previous CEO Bruce Lindsey was pushed to the position of chairman of the board two years ago so Chelsea could bring in an old colleague, Eric Braverman, according to the Post.

But even that didn’t last long.

“[Braverman] was her boy, but he tried to hire his own communications professional and actually tried to run the place,” an insider told the Post.


“He didn’t understand that that wasn’t what he was supposed to be doing. He was pushed out.
Chelsea has embraced living high-on-the-hog as a corporate CEO and employs a personal staff almost as big as her father’s, according to the Post.

Chelsea who once commanded a $600,000 per year salary from NBC for doing virtually nothing, was apparently no easier to work with while working there, and co-workers allegedly called her “unapproachable.”


“If someone wanted to talk to Chelsea about something, they had to go through a producer,” an NBC source told the Post.

According to the Post, the high turnover rate at the Clinton Foundation also includes Matt McKenna, Chelsea’s ex-spokesman, and Ginny Ehrlich, founding CEO of the Clinton Health Matters Initiative, who now works for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Amidst growing scandals revolving around allegations that the Clinton Foundation has become a giant slush fund for Bill, Hillary and Chelsea, foundation loyalists are disheartened.

“The operational planning has gone downhill,” a source told the Post.
“It’s sad to see what’s happening.”

Via: BIZPAC Review

Continue Reading....

House GOPers demand IRS investigate Clinton Foundation

Hillary Rodham Clinton, with husband Bill and daughter Chelsea (The Washington Times) **FILE**
House Republicans on Tuesday demanded the IRS open an investigation into the Clinton Foundation’s tax-exempt status, questioning whether the organization has broken faith with its charitable mission by hiding some donations.
The foundation, associated with former President Bill Clinton, his wife, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, and their daughter, has been in the news as Mrs. Clinton’s campaign ramps up.
Foundation officials have admitted they made an “error” in inaccurately reporting certain types of grants, and have had to correct their filings.


“Media reports containing specific allegations have cast a cloud over the Clinton Foundation and call into question whether it is acting within the scope of its charitable mission for which it was originally granted tax-exempt status,” said Rep. Marsha Blackburn, Tennessee Republican, who led the letter, signed by 51 other House lawmakers.
The letter was to IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, and accused the foundation of using “the cloak of philanthropy” to facilitate major business deals for Clinton pals — including during the time Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state in the Obama administration.
The Clinton Foundation didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
Via: Washington Times
Continue Reading....

Popular Posts