Showing posts with label Healthcare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Healthcare. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Plan targets health care bias against transgender people

FILE - In this July 21, 2014 file photo, President Barack Obama pauses as he speaks before signing executive orders to protect LGBT employees from federal workplace discrimination in the East Room of the White House in Washington.  The Obama administration has proposed to ban discrimination against transgender people throughout the health care system, carrying out anti-bias provisions in the president's health overhaul.   (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
WASHINGTON (AP) — Mirroring a shift in society, the Obama administration proposed Thursday to ban discrimination against transgender people throughout the health care system.
Once the proposed regulations are final, they should expand insurance coverage for gender transition and prohibit health care facilities from denying transgender people access to restrooms that match their individual gender identity.
The new protections are part of a broader rule from the Department of Health and Human Services to carry out anti-bias provisions of President Barack Obama's health care law. In a first, the law specified that sex discrimination is prohibited in health care, and the regulation carries it a step further, clarifying that "gender identity" is included under that protective umbrella.
"This is a huge step," said Michael Silverman, director of the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund in New York. "It covers a lot of ground."
The new transgender policy comes as social attitudes about sexuality and gender are undergoing major changes. The Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right for same-sex couples to marry, and the gender transition of Olympian Bruce Jenner from male to female — Caitlyn — has brought new awareness about a group often ostracized by society.
The long-delayed rule amounts to a manual for carrying out the health law's prohibition against medical discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. Those underlying provisions already are in effect.
Jocelyn Samuels, head of the HHS Office for Civil Rights, said the rule does not explicitly require insurers to cover gender transition treatment, including surgery. But insurers could face questions if they deny medically necessary services related to gender transition by a man who identifies as a woman, or a woman who identifies as a man.
"It is basically a requirement that insurers use nondiscriminatory criteria," Samuels told reporters.
Advocates for transgender people note that insurers already pay for services such as hormone treatments and reconstructive surgery, but decline to cover them when they're part of a gender transition.
"What the rule says is they cannot exclude transgender people from the services that other people have," said Harper Jean Tobin, policy director for the National Center for Transgender Equality.
Currently, 10 states plus Washington, D.C., require private insurers to cover transgender health care, while six states plus the nation's capital cover such services through their Medicaid programs, according to advocates.
The new requirements would have impact throughout the health care system because service providers who accept federal dollars would have to comply.
Medicare and Medicaid are the cornerstone of hospital finances. That means transgender people could not be restricted from access to bathrooms or hospital wards consistent with the gender that they identify with, Samuels said.
Most doctors would be covered. Insurers that offer plans through HealthCare.gov would have to comply with the requirements in their plans off the health insurance exchange as well.
The regulation may not be final for many months. The public comment period extends through Nov. 6, and officials are seeking comment on a range of difficult issues, including religious conscience protections for service providers and whether sexual orientation — whether a person is a gay man or a lesbian — should also be protected.
Other advocates were disappointed with a separate section of the rule addressing discriminatory insurance benefits. That can happen, for example, when an insurer requires patients to pay a large share of the cost for all drugs used to treat a given condition.
The AIDS Institute and the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network said the regulation was not specific enough, and the final version needs to provide examples of benefit designs that would be considered discriminatory.

Monday, August 10, 2015

Cost of Obesity 'Will Wipe Out Healthcare'

Obesity weighs heavily on American health and wealth.
Carrying extra pounds undermines several major weight-bearing pillars of value-based healthcare, including disease prevention, population health management, and cost control. In interviews and email exchanges over the past week, a trio of obesity experts helped me gauge the crisis and suggested ways to slash obesity rates.
Jay H. Shubrook Jr., DO, a diabetes specialist and professor at Touro University College of Osteopathic Medicine in Vallejo, CA, says the societal costs of obesity are becoming too great to bear.
"Our public health is at stake," he says. "We will not make meaningful headway on the prevention and treatment of chronic disease until we change the infrastructure that supports unhealthy habits. An immigrant from almost any other country who moves to the U.S. becomes at higher risk for diabetes once they live here. We have a sedentary lifestyle with an abundance of high caloric foods at our disposal."
Shubrook has been witnessing the impact of historically high obesity rates in his patients for nearly two decades.
Before moving to California this year, he served in several clinical, leadership, and academic positions at OhioHealth O'Bleness Hospital, a 132-bed acute care facility in Athens, Ohio. In 2013, O'Bleness identified obesity and poor dietary infrastructure in Athens County as "areas of concern" in the organization's Community Health Needs Assessment. In addition to pegging the adult obesity rate in Athens County at about 31%, the O'Bleness health needs assessment sounds an alarm over limited access to healthy foods in low-income areas and an overly high percentage of fast food restaurants among the area's eateries.
"Obesity is a crisis for two reasons," Shubrook says. "We are seeing lower life expectancy rates among our children, and we already know we can't handle the economic impact of diabetes. It will wipe out healthcare."
Otis Brawley, MD, chief medical officer at the American Cancer Society, says obesity is one of the top cancer risk factors in the United States.
"The combination of high caloric intake, obesity, and lack of physical activity will surpass tobacco as the leading cause of cancer death within the next two decades. It is already a leading cause of heart disease, diabetes, and orthopedic injury," he says.
Poor dietary habits and high obesity rates threaten to cripple the healthcare industry and the broader economy, Brawley says. "It is imperative that we reverse the trend, as healthcare costs associated with [the obesity] epidemic are already dragging our economy down and eventually will collapse our economy if it continues over the next several decades."
Justin Noble, a certified nutrition coach, children's book author, and co-founder ofMyBodyVillage.com, says the healthcare industry will be unable to "move the needle" on cost of services as long as obesity and other lifestyle-related health risk factors remain out of control.
"The main issue with healthcare in America is that it is focused on treatment instead of prevention. Eighty-six percent of all healthcare spending in 2010 was for people with one or more chronic medical conditions. The gross majority of these conditions are brought about by lack of exercise, poor diet, stress, smoking, and alcohol consumption. In a nutshell, these ailments are brought on by the choices people make. If we put more effort into giving people the tools and the resources they need to make healthy choices, we will find ourselves paying less for the diseases associated with these poor choices. Until that happens, I only see the needle moving up."

Thursday, June 11, 2015

WIKILEAKS RELEASES MORE OF OBAMATRADE DRAFT ALTERING HEALTHCARE, HALTING MEDICARE REFORM

WikiLeaks is releasing another part of President Obama’s Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP).

The Healthcare Annex, according to WikiLeaks, “seeks to regulate state schemes for medicines and medical devices. It forces healthcare authorities to give big pharmaceutical companies more information about national decisions on public access to medicine, and grants corporations greater powers to challenge decisions they perceive as harmful to their interests.”
Dr. Deborah Gleeson, who gave professional review and analysis to WikiLeaks said, “The purported aim of the Annex is to facilitate ‘high-quality healthcare’ but the Annex does nothing to achieve this. It is clearly intended to cater to the interests of the pharmaceutical industry.” Gleeson added, “Nor does this do anything to promote ‘free trade.’”
“The inclusion of the Healthcare Transparency Annex in the TPP serves no useful public interest purpose. It sets a terrible precedent for using regional trade deals to tamper with other countries’ health systems and could circumscribe the options available to developing countries seeking to introduce pharmaceutical coverage programs in the future,” noted Gleeson.
For Americans, it means Congress wouldn’t be able to reform Medicare, reported WikiLeaks.
WikiLeaks reports the document isn’t released until four years after the TPP is passed into law.

Thanks, Obamacare: Rates Set to Skyrocket Across the Country

Both Clinton and Obama promised lower premiums under Obamacare, but Americans across the country are facing another round of double-digit rate hikes to their health care premiums. With every passing day under Obamacare, more and more Americans bear the consequences of Obama and Clinton's broken promises.

See how your state and your wallet could be impacted by proposed premium increases for 2016. Or download and share a graphic to spread the word on how the Obama-Clinton agenda has failed by clicking on your state.
 
STATEAVERAGE ​PREMIUM
INCREASE REQUEST
HIGHEST ​PREMIUM
INCREASE REQUEST
28.60%
70.88%
30.23%
77.53%
23.72%
78.88%
33.99%
63.70%
18.63%
34.12%
18.42%
54.28%
14.01%
20.44%
24.5%
62.57%
20.09%
64.20%
27.87%
49.87%
23.68%
100.0%
22.08%
42.43%
18.12%
26.25%
24.30%
64.90%
28.68%
49.43%
18.43%
65.44%
19.94%
55.45%
24.60%
32.59%
19.28%
37.94%
43.24%
74.13%
24.69%
46.52%
19.36%
33.82%
32.21%
48.15%
17.08%
32.28%
19.63%
72.78%
36.94%
51.27%
14.92%
30.30%
57.62%
65.01%
11.7%
43.66%
20.58%
50.73%
19.03%
22.21%
17.81%
37.66%
29.75%
45.30%
23.61%
51.54%
28.62%
61.18%
12.89%
13.50%
27.96%
53.23%
23.27%
44.43%
22.16%
46.89%
27.47%
64.75%
20.75%
58.0%
20.27%
59.71%
14.91%
46.61%
20.24%
31.32%
18.29%
32.89%
24.62%
40.91%

* Source: HealthCare.Gov, Accessed 6/4/15. Data on CA, CO, MA, ME, and CT was not available. 

Had enough of Obama and the Democrats' broken promises and harmful policies? Sign the ObamaCare pledge if you will oppose any candidate who supports ObamaCare.

Saturday, March 1, 2014

[VIDEO] Weekly Republican Address: President Obama Owes Explanation to 11 Million Workers Whose Health Care Premiums Will Go Up, Saturday March 1, 2014

WASHINGTON, DC – Delivering the Weekly Republican Address, Rep. Ann Wagner (R-MO) calls on President Obama to address a new administration report that reveals 11 million workers will pay higher premiums because of the president’s health care law.  “Mr. President, you owe our 11 million workers an explanation,” Rep. Wagner says, noting this is the latest broken promise under his health care law and that Republicans stand ready to forge better solutions for families and workers. -

Via: Speaker.gov
Continue Reading....

Monday, November 18, 2013

Majority in U.S. Say Healthcare Not Gov't Responsibility

Republicans' attitudes on this measure have changed significantly since 2000

by Joy Wilke
PRINCETON, NJ -- The 56% of U.S. adults who now say it is not the federal government's responsibility to make sure all Americans have healthcare coverage continues to reflect a record high. Prior to 2009, a clear majority of Americans consistently had said the government should take responsibility for ensuring that all Americans have healthcare.
Trend: The Role of the Federal Gov't in Ensuring Americans Have Healthcare Coverage
The most recent data were collected in Gallup's annual Health and Healthcare poll, conducted Nov. 7-10. The percentage of U.S. adults who said it is the federal government's responsibility to ensure all Americans have healthcare coverage peaked at 69% in 2006. Attitudes began to shift significantly in 2007, and continued to change through the time President Barack Obama took office in 2009. Americans who feel healthcare coverage is not the federal government's responsibility have been in the clear majority the past two years.
Most Republicans Now View Ensuring Healthcare Coverage as Outside Government Purview
Attitudes across all three partisan groups have shifted away from the view that ensuring healthcare coverage is a proper role of government, but most significantly among Republicans and independents. In September 2000, 53% of Republicans believed the government should not be responsible for ensuring all Americans had health coverage; today, 86% feel that way, an increase of 33 percentage points in 13 years. Over the same period, the percentage of Republicans believing the government should ensure healthcare coverage for all has fallen from 42% to 12%.
Fifty-five percent of independents currently say the government should not be involved with healthcare -- an increase of 28 points since 2000.
The percentage of Democrats who hold this view is now 30%, its highest level since Gallup first asked the question and an 11-point increase since 2000 -- with the largest change in opinion occurring between 2006 and 2008.
Via: Gallup
Continue Reading....

Popular Posts