LOS ANGELES: Sun, Wind, Dust and Salaries Drive DWP Rate Hikes

Imagine you are dining in a restaurant with a dozen other people and the governor of California. While you are studying the menu, the governor starts ordering for the table.

Platters arrive, and glasses are filled … and more platters and more refills.

Then the check comes.

You know how the rest of the evening goes. Who ordered the market-price renewable energy? Who ordered the coal-free electricity? Who had the rainbow smelt? How much did you put in? We’re still short. Does that include the tip? Tax is HOW much?!

For customers of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, the bill has just arrived. Over the next five years, ratepayers will have to shell out an additional $230 million for water and another $900 million for power. Three-quarters of the new money for power is needed to meet state mandates — including the Governor’s Special, a requirement to use 33 percent renewable energy by 2020.

Electricity rates will go up 3 percent per year for the “typical residential” user of 500 kilowatt hours per month. It’s worse for businesses: “Small commercial” users will see their power costs rise 3.8 percent per year, and rates for “high-use residential” customers who consume 900 kilowatt hours per month will shoot up 4.7 percent per year — plus taxes.

The DWP says 85 percent of the additional $230 million in water revenues — a 3.8 percent annual hike for “typical” users — will go toward “infrastructure repair and replacement” and “water quality.” But a big slice of that — 4 percent overall — will go to pay for the Owens Lake Dust Mitigation Project. That’s our DWP-negotiated penance for the construction of the 100-year-old Los Angeles Aqueduct. Since 2000, the DWP has been pouring 25 billion gallons per year of water — drinking water — on a dry lakebed to hold down dust, at a cost to L.A. ratepayers of $1.3 billion. In November, the DWP reached a settlement that allows the use of less water-intensive dust control methods, cutting the annual water use to 22 billion gallons in 2014 but doubling the annual cost to $217 million.

Via: California Political Review

Continue Reading....

In the Energy Debate between Palin and Obama...Obama Lost

You  know we can't just drill our way to lower gas prices. If we're going to take control of our energy future, and can start avoiding these annual gas price spikes that happen every year when the economy starts getting better, world demand starts increasing, turmoil in the Middle East or some other parts of the world, if we're going to stop being at the mercy of these world events, then we need a sustained, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy - oil, gas, wind, solar, and nuclear, and biofuels, and more.

President Obama made these remarks in February of 2012 at the University of Miami.  The President was criticizing the longstanding argument of political rival Sarah Palin, who urges the nation to "drill, baby, drill."

Palin expounded on these sentiments in 2010:

Although the Left chooses to mock the mantra of "drill, baby, drill," and they ignorantly argue against the facts pertaining to the need for America to responsibly develop her domestic supply of natural resources, surely they can't argue the national security implications of relying on foreign countries to extract supplies that America desperately needs for industry, jobs, and security. Some of the countries we're now reliant upon and will soon be beholden to can easily use energy and mineral supplies as a weapon against us.

In 2011, in an interview with the CBS affiliate WTKR in Hampton Roads, Virginia, the president contradicted his own remarks suggesting that oil prices cannot be lowered by arguing:

Via: American Thinker

Continue Reading...