Showing posts with label Major Garrett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Major Garrett. Show all posts

Sunday, July 19, 2015

SPINNING OUT OF CONTROL

What was worse: the treaty or the press conference?



It is a safe prediction that for years to come the debate over the Obama Iran deal will rage, with one question looming largest; namely, which was worse… the treaty or the press conference?

Actually, it was not a conference but what is known in Washington-speak as a “press availability.” This refers not to the press being available but to the President making himself available to the press and all its relentless scrutiny. For once Obama came through, making himself thoroughly available; all his specious sophistry, all his testy narcissism, all his Freudian solipsism, was on display. To coin a phrase, he had all his centrifuges spinning. And, as Jackie Mason would add, I say this with the highest respect.

In one contentious exchange, Major Garrett of CBS wondered how the President was “content” to leave American hostages trapped in Iran, basting in Hell while he basked in Heaven. Obama contended he was not the least bit content; why, he had even met with some of the families of the hostages!

This sort of non sequitur is terribly revealing. How could we suspect him of not caring when he even made time in his busy schedule to meet with relatives? Surely such intensive efforts will be attended with success, much as the hashtag #BringBackOurGirls saved the two hundred girls kidnapped by Boko Haram in Nigeria? What’s that you say… they were never saved… don’t be ridiculous… we never read about them in the media anymore… they must have been saved!

A man who invests so much into the effort to free our hostages from Iran is just the sort of man we should trust to protect Israel from the threat of nuclear annihilation! Why won’t that right-wing kook Netanyahu quit all his fussing?

There were other juicy tidbits throughout the event. One in particular summed up for me the combination of poor traits that make up the portrait of our young President. Amid the press of the corps, one spunky voice emerged (I paraphrase): “Mr. President, does it disturb you that Prime Minister Assad of Syria and President Rouhani of Iran are making public statements to the effect this deal is a big victory for Iran?”

Obama replied: “It does not concern me that they are spinning the deal in their favor. That is what politicians do!” And he punched the “do” with some real fervor.

At least two very distorted beliefs are revealed in this exchange. The first is a crimp in the true part of the answer; the second stands separately as the false part of the answer. Sure, the answer is partially true. He is right not to be concerned about their spinning because they are liars and tyrants who would tell you they won even if everyone knew they lost, like the guy with blood on his hands and his DNA under the victim’s fingernails who says the jury should acquit because there is “no evidence.” But the way to make that point is by saying: “That is what liars do. That is what tyrants do.” They lie because they are liars, not because they are in a career that makes allowances for wishful interpretation.

So even when his point is valid, his presentation opens a dreary window into his world.
But the false part of his statement is doubly shocking, offensive, misleading, misguiding, corrupting. He tells us that a sitting President or Prime Minister may legitimately regard his role as being “a politician,” thus availing him of the leeway afforded to candidates for office. He may present his actions in matters of life and death to the public in the best possible light. That is what politicians do…

No way! Absolutely cringe-inducingly false!

A candidate is a politician. Once elected he is a governor. A politician may spin things, not to falsify but to magnify, to sell what he believes, to promote a sense of hope and optimism, to set an ideal to which he can aspire. This is a dispensation that must be managed discerningly, but at least it can be defended.

But to spin while in office?! Unconscionable. In office you are a governor, a leader, a representative of the people and every word out of your mouth must be the absolute truth or the closest you can approach it in good faith. The people, the ones who believed your hype, who bought your hope, have placed absolute faith in your judgment, your temperament, your character, your integrity. There is no room at all for manipulating the perceptions of events to create an illusion of success when it is not paralleled by reality.

Mister President, if you think lying to the people while in office is what “politicians do,” pardon us for not trusting you with our lives in negotiating arrangements with rabid haters out to kill us and destroy our way of life.



Friday, July 17, 2015

[EDITORIAL] President Obama’s hissy fit. A reporter’s question about the Iranian deal hits a raw nerve

President Barack Obama speaks in the Choctaw Nation on economic opportunities for underprivileged communities across the nation, on Wednesday, July 15, 2015, in Durant, Okla. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
There is not a lot to love in President Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran, despite the attempted assurances in his what’s-not-to-like press conference on Wednesday. In addition to the near-unanimous doubts about his “air-tight verification” promises, which he insists make a nuclear arms race in the Middle East less likely, a short list of what’s wrong with the deal must include the names of four Americans: Jason Rezaian, Saeed AbediniAmir Hekmati and Robert Levinson. They’re American hostages in Iran, and they just lost their best chance for freedom. Mr. Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry apparently “forgot” to press for their release.
Major Garrett of CBS News questioned the president’s judgment, asking: “As you well know, there are four Americans in Iran — three held on trumped-up charges and according to your administration, one [whose] whereabouts [are] unknown. Can you tell the country, sir, why you are content with all the fanfare around this deal to leave the conscience of this nation, the strength of this nation, unaccounted for in relation to these four Americans?”
Flummoxed, Mr. Obama responded: “The notion that I’m content as I celebrate, with American citizens languishing in Iranian jails — Major, that’s nonsense, and you should know better.” Judging from the president’s aggrieved and scolding tone, Mr. Garrett’s question hit a raw nerve. This was not a frivolous question, but one millions of Americans were eager to hear the president answer. Why, indeed, did the president leave this out of the negotiations? How better to demonstrate that he couldn’t be pushed around? How better could the Iranians demonstrate good faith?
Mr. Obama made a second attempt to explain. “If the question is why we did not tie the negotiations to their release, think about the logic that that creates. Suddenly Iran realizes, ‘You know what? Maybe we can get additional concessions out of the Americans by holding these individuals.’ “
Mr. Obama is widely regarded as having given away the store to get something he could call a deal. The Iranians, masters of bazaar haggling, clearly took advantage of the president’s eagerness, leading him to puzzle over what else he could give up to get his deal. Had he never matched wits with a used-car salesman? The mullahs even squeezed out a last-minute concession that enablesIran to resume trading in weapons in five years — something that hadn’t even been on the table.
Jason Razaian, the Tehran bureau chief of The Washington Post, was charged with espionage, and has been held in prison for a year. Saeed Abedini, an Iranian-born American living in Idaho, is a Christian pastor who was arrested in 2012 while visiting Iran. He was sentenced to eight years in prison for attempting to “undermine” the regime.
Amir Hekmati is a former U.S. Marine from Michigan who was visiting his grandmother. He was charged with spying and has been imprisoned since 2011. Robert Levinson, a former FBI agent, vanished in Iran in 2007 on a private investigation, but photographs show him alive and apparently a hostage of the Iranian government.

Thursday, July 16, 2015

[VIDEO] OBAMA SCOLDS REPORTER, SAYS HE’S WORKING ‘DILIGENTLY’ TO GET FOUR AMERICANS OUT OF IRAN

Major Garrett had the audacity to ask Obama why, with all the fanfare around the Iran deal, that he’s content to leave four Americans in Iran. Well, that kinda pissed Obama off and he scolded Major Garrett for suggesting that he’s content:



Obama pretends that if he had made the four Americans part of this deal, that Iran could have used them to squeeze even more concessions out of them. Heh, is that even possible?
In reality Obama could have demanded the release of the Americans as a pre-condition to negotiation, so that before the negotiations had even begun, they would have been home already and wouldn’t be part of the actual negotiations.
So he can scold reporters and feign outrage that Iran is holding these four Americans, but in reality if he really cared, they would be home already.
Via: The Right Scoop

Continue Reading...

CNN’s Dana Bash: Major Garrett Crossed Line with ‘Disrespectful’ Obama Question

dana bash
A lot happened during President Obama‘s Iran presser today, but the moment getting the most attention is when CBS’ Major Garrett confronted the president by asking, “Why you are content with all the fanfare around this deal to leave the conscience of this nation, the strength of this nation unaccounted for in relation to these four Americans?”

Obama took some offense at the question, saying, “That’s nonsense, and you should know better.”
Garrett defended himself a little later, insisting he intended to pose a provocative question. But a fellow reporter thought he went a little too far.
CNN’s Dana Bash said after the presser, “There’s a fine line between asking a tough question and maybe crossing that line a little bit and being disrespectful, and I think that happened here.”

Friday, November 15, 2013

[VIDEO] CBS: Obama's 'Patch' of Insurance Cancellations 'Fell Flat'; 'Created Another Mess'

Major Garrett pointed out on Friday's CBS This Morning that the politician's Thursday "attempt to fix the problem of canceled insurance policies...fell flat", as it failed to satisfy his Democratic allies in Congress, who are nervous about the next election. Garrett devoted much of his report on the morning newscast, as well on Thursday's CBS Evening News, to his hard-hitting questioning of the politician, where he hounded the politician over the ObamaCare debacle.

The journalist also underscored that "many state insurance commissioners...[are] unlikely to enforce the President's new policy". He also spotlighted an insurance industry expert's stinging assessment of this supposed fix: [MP3 audio available herevideo below the jump]
ROBERT LASZEWSKI, HEALTH POLICY AND STRATEGY ASSOCIATES PRESIDENT: I have no idea who is advising this President in how the insurance market works. But they've just created another mess here, on top of all the other messes they've created.
Garrett wasted little time before playing a clip of the President's "now-infamous" promise to the American people – that "if you like your insurance plan, you will keep it". He continued that Obama's Thursday proposal to "give consumers with canceled individual insurance policies a chance to get them back....will not be easy."

The CBS correspondent then played his soundbite of Laszewski, and added that "some Democrats said the so-called ObamaCare patch fell short, since it's only a one-year fix". He spent the rest of the segment with two extended excerpts from the White House press conference, where Garrett confronted the Democrat over his administration's beyond botched handling of the health care issue:
MAJOR GARRETT (voice-over): CBS News asked the President why he promised people could keep their plans in the first place.

Thursday, November 14, 2013

CBS’s Major Garrett Confronts Obama on Broken ‘Keep Your Plan’ Promises: ‘Do You Regret It?’

Following remarks on a “keep your plan” fix for the Affordable Care Act, CBS reporter Major Garrett grilled the president Thursday afternoon on whether Americans deserve “greater accountability” surrounding the administration’s repeated promises to the American people that “if you like your plan, you can keep it.”
“You said while the law was being debated, ‘If you like your plan, you can keep it,’” Garrett began. “You said after the law was implemented or signed, ‘If you liked your plan, you can keep it.’ Americans believed you, sir, when you said that to them over and over.”
“Do you not believe, sir, the American people deserve a deeper, more transparent accountability from you as to why you said that over and over when your own statistics alerted your policy staff — and I presume you — to the fact that millions of Americans would, in fact, probably fall into the very gap you’re trying to administratively fix right now?” he asked, adding another question: “You were informed that [Healthcare.gov] was failing the most basic tests internally, and yet a decision was made to launch the web site on October 1st. Did you make that, and if so, do you regret that?”
The president responded that he was “not informed directly” about the website’s potential failings. “Had I been informed, I wouldn’t be going out saying, boy, this is going to be great, you know?”
“I’m accused of a lot of things, but I don’t think I’m stupid enough to go around saying this is going to be like shopping on Amazon or Travelocity a week before the website opens if I thought it wasn’t going to work,” he added.
And regarding the “keep your plan” promises, Obama told Garrett: “There is no doubt that the way I put that forward unequivocally ended up not being accurate. It was not because of my intention not to deliver on that commitment and that promise. We put a grandfather clause into the law, but it was insufficient,” he conceded.
Admitting that the grandfather clause did not work sufficiently for the millions of Americans who recently lost their healthcare plans, Obama reitreated: “That’s on me. And that’s why i’m trying to fix it. and as I’ve said earlier — I guess last week and I will repeat — that’s something I deeply regret, because it’s scary getting a cancellation notice.”
Garrett later followed up with a separate, tougher question: “Did you decide, sir, that the simple declaration was something the American people could handle but this nuanced stance that you just gave now was something they couldn’t handle, and you didn’t trust the American people with the fuller truth?”
“No,” the president replied. “My expectation was that for 98% of the American people either it genuinely wouldn’t change at all, or they’d be pleasantly surprised with the options in the marketplace and that the grandfather clause would cover the rest. That proved not to be the case. And that’s on me. And the American people — those who got cancellation notices — do deserve and have received an apology from me.”

Monday, November 11, 2013

[VIDEO] CBS's Garrett: 'Desperate' Obama Admin. Hopes to 'End ObamaCare Blues'

On Monday's CBS This Morning, Major Garrett emphasized the Obama administration was "desperate" to reverse the debacle over its so-called Affordable Care Act, twice asserting the executive branch was trying to "end the ObamaCare blues". Garrett also pointed out that "the White House has lowered expectations – both politically and mathematically –about as low as humanly possible" regarding ObamaCare enrollment numbers.

However, unlike his colleague Jan Crawford, the correspondent failed to explicitly point out how millions of Americans are losing their current health care coverage due to the controversial law. Instead, Garrett played up the larger expense of the new ObamaCare-friendly plans: [audio available herevideo below the jump]
MAJOR GARRETT: ...[T]he White House is going to look at that solution it hopes to offer this week for those in the individual market whose costs are higher than expected. The President apologized for that last week, and White House aides tell me the President never would have apologized if he didn't have a solution he could offer.
Via: Newsbusters

Continue Reading.....

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Jay Carney Clarifies Obamacare ‘Confusion’: ‘Individual Mandate Timing Has Not Changed’

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney attempted to clear up any lingering “confusion” over the question of delaying the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate during his daily briefing Thursday. Answering a question from CBS News’Major Garrett, Carney confirmed that the “individual mandate timing has not changed.”
Garrett asked Carney if the change, which would move the deadline for people to sign up for insurance with penalty from February 15th to March 31st, would require congressional approval or if it falls within the Health and Human Services department’s jurisdiction. “I appreciate the question because I know there was some confusion last night,” Carney said, perhaps referring to the NBC Nightly News report about a delay to the individual mandate and subsequent denial by White House Deputy Press Secretary Josh Earnest.
“The individual mandate timing has not changed,” Carney said emphatically. “The deadline for signing up for insurance was and is March 31st.” He said what the administration has been working on is “aligning the deadlines for enrollment and enforcement,” which would mean someone could enroll by March 31st and avoid the penalty even if that insurance has not yet become active. “In other words,” Carney said, “if you have insurance by March 31st, because you’ve purchased but it has not kicked in, you should not be penalized.”
“A lot of reporting on this has gotten ahead of the actual facts,” Carney said, adding that the “guidance” from the White House meant to resolve the issue “has not been finalized.” He said it is his “understanding” that the change will not require any action from Congress.
Watch video below, via C-SPAN 3:
Via: Mediaite.com
Continue Reading.....

Popular Posts